Could David and Elijah Be the Antichrist and False Prophet after Satan Is Released?
From ‘my servant David’ and David’s Son and Lord to Elijah at the Transfiguration and the final two witnesses
Revelation never identifies David and Elijah as the post-Millennium Antichrist and false prophet; Xiaoyang’s model asks whether the most mature deception could redirect real persons, texts and miracles away from Jesus.
From ‘my servant David’ and David’s Son and Lord to Elijah at the Transfiguration and the final two witnesses
- 01Ordinary tyrants may not deceive a world that experienced Jesus’ reign.
- 02David has unrivalled royal and Messianic legitimacy.
- 03Elijah has unrivalled prophetic and eyewitness legitimacy.
- 04Their proposed roles are a model, not biblical identification.
- 05Laozi and the Buddha as witnesses is the most remote speculation.
- 06The final test is whether a person still points to and follows the Lamb.
Read the in-depth version
Series recap
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Could an ordinary politician deceive that world?
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
This is not a claim that David and Elijah were villains
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
David stands at the gateway of Messianic kingship
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
The reinterpretive power of ‘my servant David’
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Replacement need not begin by denying Jesus
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Being used by God does not remove freedom
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Elijah’s legitimacy as a spokesman for Jesus
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
The danger may begin with those who remain
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
From witness to interpreter and spokesman
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
An Elijah-like sign in Revelation
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
King and prophet form a complete counterfeit kingdom
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Many truths plus one fatal error
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Could the true witnesses be the least qualified?
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Laozi and the Buddha as ordinary believers
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Laozi and the life humanity would not return to
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
The Buddha and learning to follow the Lamb
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Recognising false Eden and false New Jerusalem
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Who are you to correct David and Elijah?
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Four persons: everything versus loyalty
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
What overcoming finally tests
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Following the Lamb
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
God’s final irony
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Conclusion: the most qualified replacement
This section presents Xiaoyang’s exploratory post-Millennium model while preserving the boundary between Revelation’s explicit statements and proposed identities. The biblical text does not identify David, Elijah, Laozi or the Buddha in these roles.
Frequently asked questions
Does Scripture identify David as Antichrist?
No.
Does Scripture identify Elijah as the false prophet?
No.
Are Laozi and the Buddha named as witnesses?
No; this is the article’s most speculative proposal.